Daily Archives: May 23, 2009

Attention NARRATIVE subscribers

I’ve changed email subscription services. New subscriptions will now go through FeedBlitz instead of feedblitz_logo_medFeedBurner. If you have an old subscription and your emails from this blog have been arriving in a font too small to read, you can unsubscribe and then resubscribe using the subscription link on the blog’s upper right corner.

If you subscribed using an RSS feed to your Google homepage or another web page, this update doesn’t change a thing.

Comments Off on Attention NARRATIVE subscribers

Filed under NOTED

Edit, or else

from “Copyediting. Vital. Do It or Have It Done,” in Brevity’s Craft Essays, by Diana Hume George, author of The Lonely Other: A Woman Watching America and other books.

“In my capacity as a screener, I automatically reject any book or essay that does not honor the conventions. It doesn’t matter how good the content is. Editors won’t waste their time fixing matters that should have been attended to long before the writer sent it out as a professionally finished product. I use the analogy of carpentry. It’s as if an otherwise well-designed piece of woodwork had nails sticking out at odd angles.”

“Before any book of mine reaches an editor, it has been through at least half a Diana Georgedozen complete drafts. That’s a conservative estimate. When the manuscript is as error-free as I can get it, I have it copyedited by a fellow writer or by a professional. More errors always surface, to say nothing of previously unnoted clichés and repetitions of entire phrases from previous pages that have escaped my own revisions.”

“A final word about who copyedits your book or essay: don’t automatically trust an English professor or journalist or fellow writer. . . . English professors do not necessarily know squat about copyediting, beyond the level of correcting an essay or term paper. Whatever your choice, make sure you have reason to trust the person’s skills. Don’t trust anyone to be a foolproof proofreader until you see his or her skills in action. As for doing it all yourself, few writers ever get that good at it. Very few people can edit themselves successfully, because we literally cannot see our own mechanical errors or infelicities—and infelicities are as important as actual errors.”


Filed under editing, NOTED, revision, workshopping